- This book aims to help PMO people to set up and manage a temporary PMO that effectively supports the associated project or programme.
- The book targets anyone involved in setting up or running a temporary PMO, based on IPMA and P3O.
The stated aim of this book is to show the reader how to create and maintain a business-driven PMO, because PMOs that are driven by the needs of the business succeed, whereas PMOs that are driven by other motivations fail.
THE INTERIOR OF A DIRTY CITY PUB. A SHADY BACK ROOM WITH A CONSPIRATORIAL ATMOSPHERE. We join a meeting of the Project Managers’ Revolutionary Front, where Brother Reg (the chairman of the meeting) is proposing a motion to the members (all Project Managers), and a CxO guest… Continue reading “What has the PMO ever done for us?”
This book leads with a single central principle – that a PMO’s sole reason for existence is the creation of value for the organisation, and that the single most effective way it can do that is by managing the allocation of resources to projects. Of course, tools, methodology and processes are all good things to have, but identifying how to deploy resources for the best return on that investment is where a PMO really comes into its own. Continue reading “The Agile PMO – Leading the Effective, Value Driven, Project Management Office (Book Review)”
This well-written book starts by explaining the fundamentals of Benefits Realisation Management (BRM). It debunks popular myths, and explains why adherence to outdated beliefs can prevent organisations realising all of the benefits that could arise from change. Most of this “practical guide” is devoted to applying BRM to various situations.
All over the web you will see people asking or debating what the “P” stands for in PMO. The “MO” stands for “Management Office”, but the “P” can stand for Project, Programme or Portfolio depending on the organisational context.
Axelos use the term P3O® to cover all three, but this is also confusing as the insertion of the “3” makes many people think that the final “O” is actually a “0” (zero) rather than the “O” of “Office”.
This can of course lead to confusion, so I suggest making a small alteration to remove the ambiguity. In my own writing I use:
This makes it very clear which kind of PMO we are talking about. Simples!!
What do you think?
Now, people seem to enjoy a bit of process-bashing, and I get that: nobody wants to have their working lives organised for them to the point where they become a soul-less, heartless, brainless robot, but I am proposing the idea that processes are an organisation’s memory. Continue reading “Processes are an organisation’s memory”